-
Systematic review of nine randomized, double-blinded trials (3,685 subjects),
which compared the addition of salmeterol to inhaled steroid vs. increased
dose of inhaled steroid alone.
Selection
of articles/Inclusion criteria
· Electronic database search of Medline and Embase, and Glaxo-Wellcome
internal clinical study registers.
· RCTs.
· Direct comparison salmeterol plus inhaled steroid vs. increased
dose of current inhaled steroid (at least double of patients' current
dose).
· Adolescents and adults currently using inhaled steroids.
· Currently symptomatic (based on questionnaires given to patients
or recent use of rescue medication).
· Minimum duration of treatment = 12 weeks.
- Outcome
measures: Efficacy (mean difference in PEFR and FEV1) and exacerbations
(mean percentage difference in symptoms, use of rescue treatment).
-
Data extracted from individual studies by two independent reviewers.
Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
-
Results: Patients taking salmeterol and inhaled corticosteroid compared
to patients taking increased inhaled corticosteroid alone had1:
· Better morning PEFR at three months (average 22.4 L/min greater,
95% CI 15.0-30.0 L/min, P < 0.001) and six months (average 27.7 L/min
greater, 95% CI 19.0-36.4 L/min, P < 0.001).
· Better FEV1 at three months (average 0.1 L greater, 95% CI
0.04-0.16 L, P < 0.001) and six months (average 0.08 L greater, 95%
CI 0.020-0.14 L, P < 0.001).
· Fewer days without symptoms at three months (average 12% fewer,
95% CI 9-15%, P < 0.001) and six months (average 15% fewer, 95% CI
12-18%, P < 0.001).
· Fewer days needing rescue treatment at three months (average
17% fewer, P < 0.001, 95% CI 14-20%) and six months (average 20%
fewer, P < 0.001, 95% CI 17-23%).
· Fewer nights needing rescue treatment at three months (average
9% fever, 95% CI 7-11%, P < 0.001) and six months (average 8% fewer,
95% CI 6-11%, P < 0.001).
· Fewer exacerbations of any kind (average 2.73% fewer, 95% CI
0.43-5.04%, P = 0.02).
-
Validity: Large review of randomized controlled trials with many patients,
focused clinical question, clear inclusion criteria for articles, results
consistent between studies. However, did not state how they formally
assessed the validity or quality of each study, and only limited data
from the individual studies is reported.
|