Additional
Comments
- Age is known to be a protective factor in the occurrence of UTIs. Even
when the patients in this study were stratified by age, the protective
effect of circumcision remained.
- Other studies have looked at populations with a high prevalence of
circumcision and in boys under 1 year old. Thus, it's nice to see that
this study showed a benefit in this population.
- While the complication rate for circumcision is low (0.2 - 5%), it
is not zero.
- Studies have suggested that the epithelium of the foreskin can foster
the adherence of pathogenic bacteria. In this context, the prevention
of UTIs by circumcising boys makes biologic sense.
- Individual, religious, and cultural preferences still play a major
role in the decision to circumcise a male infant.
- The authors have been subsequently criticized for their collection
methods (clean catch specimens) as this could have affected the culture
results.
Citation
- Craig
JC, Knight JF, Sureshkumar P, Mantz E, Roy LP. Effect of circumcision
on incidence of urinary tract infection in preschool boys. J
Pediatr 1996; 128(1):23-7.
|