|
|
Shorter regimens of 2-drug therapy may be as effective as 9-month INH monotherapy for latent TB infection (LTBI) |
Question
Clinical Bottom Lines |
|
1. Adequate clinical trials are not available to change the current standard treatment for LTBI. 2. A 3- or 4-month regimen of two-drug therapy (INH and rifampin) results in better compliance than 9-month INH monotherapy, but it is not clear whether long-term outcomes are non-inferior. 3. The shorter regimens have plausible mechanisms for effectiveness, and there are other studies that support effectiveness in adults and tolerance in children – quality studies of effectiveness in children would be preferred. |
|
| 1. Groups of children under 15 years of age with LTBI (+TST, –CXR, no symptoms) with similar demographic characteristics were randomized and given different regimens: Group A (9 months INH) vs. Group B (4 months INH + rifampin). 2. There were more patients with poor compliance in the longer regimen (Group A: 13.8%) than in the shorter one (Group B: 7.6%) by a significant margin (p=0.029). 3. There were more new radiographic findings of suggestive of active TB in Group A (24.0% vs. 11.8%, p=0.001) after 4 months of therapy. No data are presented regarding outcomes later in the treatment and during follow-up periods. This limitation minimizes the validity of this study to my patient. 4. The 4 month vs. 3 month regimens of INH/rifampin, examined in a second period of the study, had no significant differences in compliance or measured effectiveness. |
Additional Comments
Citation
|
|
|
CAT
Author: Eric Dziuban, MD
|
|
Last updated June 15, 2009 Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases © 1998-2002 University of Michigan Health System |