Welcome To The Staff Education Page
Of The Pain Website
Inadequate treatment of pain is a major problem, estimated to cost American society over $50 billion annually. Effective treatment of pain became a national issue during the debate over assisted suicide in the late 1990s. Unexpectedly, the repeating theme of the New York state hearings was that patients wanted assisted suicide available because they feared an agonizingly painful death, and did not trust the medical community to provide adequate pain relief. Pain surveys confirmed that, despite having the knowledge and technology available to treat pain effectively, patients were routinely allowed to experience significant pain.
The JCAHO has responded with a new set of standards, effective in 2001, that mandates the routine assessment and treatment of pain. This website is designed to provide you a basic pain knowledge base, and serve as a springboard for further learning in the area of pain management. We hope that you find it useful, and would appreciate your comments on improving the site for those who come after you.
Part 1- JCAHO Standards and intent
Part 2- UMHHC Pain Policy Highlights
Part 3- Pain information given to all patients
Part 4 Adult Pain Management staff education
Part 5 Pediatric Pain Management staff education
Part 1 JCAHO Standards
JCAHO has revised some of the existing standards and also added new ones to reflect a new emphasis upon pain management. In this section, we will list only the JCAHO standards relevant to pain management and summarize any changes in the intent language. Any completely new language will be underlined. The standards also include examples of implementation and evidence of performance. You may refer to the official handbook at the JCAHO site: www.jcaho.org for full details.
Standard RI.1.2 Patients are involved in all aspects of their care.
Relevant intent:
Hospital promote patient and family involvement in all aspects of their care through implementation of policies and procedures that are compatible with the hospital’s mission and resources, have diverse input, and guarantee communication across the organization. Patient are involved in at least the following aspects of their care:
Standard RI.1.2.8 Patients have the right to appropriate assessment and management of pain
Relevant intent:
Pain can be a common part of the patient experience; unrelieved pain has adverse physical and psychological effects. The patient’s right to pain management is respected and supported. The organization plans, supports, and coordinates activities and resources to assure the pain of all individuals is recognized and addressed appropriately. This includes:
Standard PE.1.4 Pain is assessed in all patients
Relevant intent
In the initial assessment, the organization identifies patients with pain. When pain is identified, the patient can be treated within the organization or referred for treatment. The scope of treatment is based upon the care setting and services provided. A more comprehensive assessment is performed when warranted by the patient's condition. This assessment and a measure of pain intensity and quality (eg, pain character, frequency, location, duration), appropriate to the patient's age, are recorded in a way that facilitates regular reassessment and follow up according to criteria developed by the organization.
Standard TX.3.3 Policies and procedures support safe medication prescription or ordering.
Relevant intent
Procedures supporting safe medication prescription or ordering address:
Standard TX.5.4 The patient is monitored during the post procedure period.
Relevant intent
The patient is monitored continuously throughout the post procedure period. The following items are monitored:
Standard PR.1.7 Patients are taught that pain management is a part of treatment
Relevant intent:
The hospital uses guidelines in educating patients on the following topics:
Standard CC.6.1 The discharge process provides for continuing care based on the patient’s assessed needs at the time of discharge.
Relevant intent:
Discharge planning identifies patients’ continuing physical, emotional, symptom management (for example, pain, nausea, dyspnea), housekeeping, transportation, social, and other needs and arranges for services to meet them.
Standard PI.3.1 The organization collects data to monitor its performance
Relevant intent:
Data that the organization considers for collection to monitor performance include:
Part 2 Pain Policy Highlights (Full Policy Link)
The UMHS policy is intended to assist practitioners in adhering to JCAHO standards. Important Highlights from this policy are:
Part 3 Pain Information given to all patients
Pain Management for Adult Patients at the University of Michigan Medical Center
Pain can have a serious impact on your quality of life. Pain can change your mood, cause you to lose sleep, and interfere with your daily activities. You have a right to good pain management. It is your responsibility to inform us about your pain in order to achieve the best results.
Our recommendations:
Pain Management for Children at the University of Michigan Medical Center
Pain can have a serious impact on your child’s quality of life. Pain can change your child’s mood, cause loss of sleep, and interfere with daily activities. Your child has a right to good pain management. It is the responsibility of you and your child to inform us about your child’s pain in order to achieve the best results.
Our recommendations:
Part 4 Adult Pain Management Staff Education
Barriers to Effective Pain Management
Both patients and providers establish barriers
Provider Barriers
Patient Barriers
Patients often share similar concerns and all too often seem willing to "tough it out" rather than complain about their pain. A patient may be reluctant to report pain because of a belief in these myths:
Basic Concepts Of Pain Management
It is very important to know and recognize the patient’s physiological, psychological, and emotional responses to pain when developing a pain management plan. Without addressing these important issues, it is often difficult to develop an adequate pain treatment plan.
Changes in vital signs do not occur with all patients who are experiencing severe pain. Do not rely on vital signs to determine the severity of a patient’s pain.
Patients with pain, even severe pain, can be distracted from thinking about their pain, and may even be able to sleep. Don’t trust that a patient isn’t having pain because he "looks comfortable." Always ask, and believe the patient’s assessment of his own pain.
Treat the pain, reassess frequently, and conitinue to treat until the patient is comfortable or side effects prevent further treatment. If this occurs, consult a pain expert- don’t leave a patient in pain without a treatment plan.
Pain Assessment and Documentation
Pain Assessment
A physician, nurse, and/or other health care professional should identify the presence of pain for each patient encounter at UMHHC . If pain is present, its intensity is scored, typically using a standardized 0 to 10 scale. (see "pain scales" below). Pain scores are documented in writing, just like vital signs, making them readily available to all members of the health care team. The JCAHO actually suggests that pain should be thought of as the 5th vital sign.
In the hospital setting, the patient’s pain is assessed at least as often as vital signs are taken, because ongoing assessment is necessary to evaluate changes in pain and the effectiveness of its treatment. Pain should be assessed at intervals appropriate to the severity of pain and the patient’s situation. For many patients, this will mean assessment of pain every 4 hours, but the time between assessments must be individualized to the patient’s need.
In the ambulatory care setting, pain assessment should be completed with every new episode of care. Repeated visits or contacts for the same problem may not require repeated pain assessments (unless a current pain problem is being followed).
Pain Scales
Scales should be developmentally, physically, emotionally and cognitively appropriate for the given patient.
Suggested standardized tools with 0 to 10 scoring are listed below. Other scales may be adopted for specific UMHHC units.
(See the instructions and illustrations that follow.)
Numeric Rating Scale
Ask the patient to rate their pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable). Some patients are unable to do this with only verbal instructions, but may be able to look at a number scale and point to the number that describes the intensity of their pain.
Color Scale
This scale is a colored stripe in which color gradually changes from white (no pain) through shades of pink to dark red (worst possible pain). Ask the patient to point to the area on the scale that shows their level of pain. To obtain a number for documentation use the scale parallel to the color stripe to find the number corresponding to the area where the patient points.

Word Graphic Scale
This scale can be used with patient as young as 6 years of age. It uses a line with words to describe pain intensity from "no pain" to "worst possible pain". Show and explain the scale to the patient and then ask him or her to point (or mark) anywhere along the line that shows how much pain they have. To find a number for documentation count the black dots, starting with zero at the far left, to the area where the patient points, up to ten at the far right.
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale

From Wong DL, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML, Ahmann E, DiVito-Thomas PA: Whaley and Wong’s Nursing Care of Infants and Children, ed. 6, St. Louis, 1999, Mosby, p. 1153.
This scale can be used with young children (sometimes as young as 3 years of age). It also works well for many older children and adults as well as for those who speak a different language. Explain that each face represents a person who may have no pain, some pain, or as much pain as imaginable. Point to the appropriate face and say:
(0) "This face is happy and does not hurt at all."
(2) "This face hurts just a little bit."
(4) "This face hurts a little more."
(6) "This face hurts even more."
(8) "This face hurts a whole lot."
Ask the patient to choose the face that best matches how she or he feels or how much they hurt.
FLACC Scale
This is a behavior scale that has been tested with children age 3 months to 7 years. Each of the five categories (Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) is scored from 0-2 and the scores are added to get a total from 0-10. Behavioral pain scores need to be considered within the context of the child’s physiological status, anxiety and other environmental factors.

Pain Documentation
Pain assessment results can be charted in a variety of places:
Inpatient:
Place pain score below the charting area for vital signs. Updates can be entered every hour.( See sample)
On the reverse side of the flow sheet is an area labeled "cognitive/perceptual" or "rest and comfort". (See sample) This charting space allows documentation of pain score, comfort level AND patient satisfaction with their current level of pain. Any additional information can be noted in the "other" section at the bottom of this page.
When a PCA or Epidural is being utilized, pain scores can be documented here.
The note may indicate the intensity and characteristics of the patient’s pain, along with current treatment and future pain plan.
Ambulatory care
1) Clinic notes
Classification of Pain
Pain is defined as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage." (International Association for the Study of Pain)
Pain can be separated into two broad categories: acute pain and chronic pain. This distinction is not perfect- cancer pain, for example, may have components of both. Nevertheless, it remains a useful way to classify pain.
Acute Pain
Acute pain is the symptom of a larger disease process, and is usually nocioceptive in nature. This means that a noxious (unpleasant) event stimulates the intact nervous system to produce the sensation of pain. Examples of this noxious event include a surgical incision, labor pain, acute pancreatitis or a myocardial infarction.
Acute pain can be somatic or visceral or neuropathic in origin. Somatic pain is sharp and well localized in nature, usually to an external site. Visceral pain tends to be dull and vaguely localized to a deep site, and is frequently associated with nausea. Acute pain is self-limiting, and resolves when the noxious stimulus ceases.
Physiological and psychological responses to acute pain are directed toward escape from the painful situation. Acute pain usually triggers a neuroendocrine stress response, which is proportional to the intensity of the pain. This is a variant of the fight-or-flight response. Catecholamines are released, increasing heart rate, blood pressure, and systemic vascular resistance. Other effects of this catecholamine release may include urinary retention, ileus, stress ulcers, increased work of breathing, nausea, and constipation.
The predominant emotional response to acute pain is anxiety, although anger toward caretakers may also be expressed. These emotional responses indicate that the patient believes the pain to be temporary and "fixable", and represent an attempt to escape from the painful stimulus.
Acute pain usually responds well to non-steroidal pain relievers and/or narcotics. Frequently, neural blockade can effectively relieve acute pain and de-
crease the likelihood of developing a chronic pain syndrome.
Chronic Pain
Chronic pain is pain that persists beyond the expected time of healing. The time course for the development of chronic pain is variable, and arbitrary time classifications (eg, longer than 6 months) will often be inaccurate. The ongoing pain itself has now become a significant disease process, not just a symptom of a disease process. The transition to chronic pain is marked by changes in both physiological and psychological responses. Instead of trying to escape the painful situation, the patient is now trying to adapt to ongoing pain.
The neuroendocrine stress response is typically exhausted in chronic pain states, and catecholamine induced changes are now absent. Vegetative responses predominate, including sleep disorders, irritability, depression, and decreased motor activity. Patients often appear subdued, sleepy or sad in appearance.
Psychological factors are important in chronic pain. Withdrawal and depression are common, causing severe strain on social and family support systems. Narcotic tolerance is frequent, further complicating the treatment of this patient group.
While chronic pain can be somatic or visceral, it is very often neuropathic in nature. Nervous system tissue has been damaged, and abnormally maintains the sensation of pain without any external stimulus. Neuropathic pain is usually associated with some form of sensory deficit, and is described as typically raw or burning in nature.
Unlike acute pain, narcotics alone are usually ineffective in relieving chronic pain. Treatment of chronic pain states involves the use of antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and/or corticosteroids. Additionally, diagnostic and theraputic nerve blocks can be helpful.
BASIC PHARMACOLOGIC PAIN MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES
|
Pain Severity |
Analgesic Choice |
Examples |
|
Mild (pain score 1-3) |
Acetaminophen, Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Agents |
TylenolÒ , ibuprofen (MotrinÒ ), naproxen (NaprosynÒ ) |
|
Moderate (pain score 4-6) |
IV Ketorolac, oral acetaminophen/opioid combinations |
ToradolÒ , VicodinÒ , TyloxÒ , TylenolÒ with codeine #3 |
|
Severe (pain score 7-10) |
Opioid |
Morphine, hydromorphone (DilaudidÒ ), fentanyl |
Dilute the naloxone and administer it very slowly in increments. Giving too much naloxone or giving it too fast can precipitate severe pain (which is extremely difficult to control) and increase sympathetic activity leading to hypertension, tachycardia, ventricular arrhythmias, pulmonary edema and cardiac arrest. Withdrawal can be precipitated in physically dependent patients.
Use Of The Equianalgesic Table
It is often necessary to change the route of a patient’s pain medication or the drug itself. Examples of this include a patient who:
By using the relative potency estimate (equianalgies dose), one can rationally change from one opioid to another or from one route of administration to another in an attempt to maintain or improve analgesia.
The equianalgesic table was developed to determine the appropriate dose of the new medication. In order to calculate the new dose, three pieces of information are necessary:
A sample calculation follows the equianalgesic table.
APPROXIMATE OPIOID EQUIANALGESIC DOSES (ADULT)***
|
DRUG |
DOSE (mg) Parenteral |
DOSE (mg) Oral |
DURATION (hour) |
|
Morphine |
10 |
30 a |
4 -6 |
|
Morphine – Sustained Release (MS Contin, Oramorph SR) |
--- |
30 |
8 –12 |
|
Morphine – Sustained Release (Kadian) |
--- |
30 |
24 |
|
Hydromorphone (Dilaudid) |
1.5 |
7.5 |
4 - 5 |
|
Meperidine (Demerol) b |
75 |
300 |
2 -4 |
|
Fentanyl (Sublimaze, Duragesic) |
0.1 |
1 – 2 |
|
|
Codeine c, h (Tylenol with codeine #2, #3 or #4) |
120 |
200 |
4 - 6 |
|
Hydrocodone d (Vicodin, Lortab) |
--- |
30 |
4 - 6 |
|
Oxycodone e(Percodan, Percocet, Tylox, Roxicet, Roxicodone)) |
--- |
20 |
4 - 6 |
|
Oxycodone Controlled Release (Oxycontin) |
--- |
20 |
8 - 12 |
|
Methadone (Dolophine) f |
3 |
4 – 8 |
|
|
Propoxyphene (Darvon, Darvocet) g, h |
--- |
180 – 240 |
4 |
|
These following agents are NOT opioids. In general, they are weaker analgesics. The equianalgeisa dose is for information only and, with the exception of ketorolac, it is NOT a reasonable or appropriate dose. |
|||
|
Tramadol (Ultram) |
--- |
300 |
4 - 6 |
|
Ketorolac (Toradol) |
10-30 |
10 |
6 |
|
Rofexocib (Vioxx) |
--- |
160 |
24 |
|
Ibuprofen (Motrin) |
--- |
1300 |
6 – 8 |
|
Acetaminophen (Tylenol) |
--- |
3900 |
4 |
|
Aspirin |
--- |
3900 |
4 |
a IM:PO ratio is 1:6 (10mg IM = 60mg po) with single or intermittent dosing. With chronic dosing, the ratio changes to 1:3 (10mg IM = 30mg po).
b Not recommended for pain management. Keep doses under 600mg/day and do not use for > 48 hours.
c Most preparations contain either 15, 30 or 60mg of codeine with 300mg acetaminophen. Do not exceed 4 grams/day of acetaminophen.
d Preparations contain either 5, 7.5 or 10mg of hydrocodone in combination with acetaminophen (500, 650 or 750mg) or aspirin (500mg). Do not exceed 4 grams/day of acetaminophen or aspirin.
e Preparations contain 5mg oxycodone in combination with acetaminophen or aspirin (325 or 500mg). Do not exceed 4 grams/day of acetaminophen or aspirin.
f Methadone is much more potent than previously described in the literature and it accumulates with repeated dosing. A highly individual and cautious approach when switching from another potent opioid must be taken. Please consult the Acute Pain Service.
g Darvocet N 50 contains 325mg acetaminophen; Darvocet N 100 contains 650mg acetaminophen. Do not exceed 4 grams/day of acetaminophen.
Equianalgesic Dose Conversion Formula ***
Dose for current drug (from equianalgesic chart) 24-hour dose of current drug (scheduled and rescue doses)
----------------------------------------------------------------- = ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dose for new drug (from equianalgesic chart) 24-hour dose of new drug
*** These are NOT suggested starting doses; these are doses of opioids that produce approximately the same amount of analgesia. Published trials vary in the suggested doses that are equianalgesic to morphine. By using this table, you can determine a dose of a new opioid and/or route of administration that is approximately equal in analgesic effect to the dose of the former opioid. Titration to clinical response is necessary. Recommended doses do not apply to patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency or other conditions affecting drug metabolism and kinetics. Elderly patients generally require lower doses, titrated slowly to the desired effect or untolerable side effects.
Selected References:
Principles of Analgesic Use in the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain, American Pain Society, 1999
Acute Pain Management in Adults: Operative Procedures. Quick Reference Guide for Clinicians. AHCPR Pub. No. 92-0019. 1992
Micromedex ® Healthcare Series Drugdex Drug Evaluations
Example of equianalgesic conversions:
A patient is on PCA morphine and is now able to take oral medications, such as Tylox (acetaminophen 500mg + oxycodone 5mg). Over the past 24 hours, the patient has used 24mg of morphine. To calculate an equianalgesic dose:
--- = ----
x = 48 mg of oxycodone/day
-since oxycodone is administered every 4-6 hours, divide 48mg/day
by 4 doses/day = 12mg/dose.
-Each Tylox tablet contain 5mg oxycodone so 2 tablets every 6 hours
would be an equianalgesic dose. This is also the maximum dose (4 grams/day of acetaminophen.)
Preventing And Managing Common Opioid Side Effects
The use of opioids is associated with the occurrence of drug side effects, which become more common as doses of opioids are increased to treat severe pain. These side effects include nausea and vomiting, constipation, pruritis (itching), mental confusion, sedation, respiratory depression and hypersensitivity reactions. Proper use of opioids includes management of these side effects, rather than discontinuation of opioids in a patient with severe pain.
Non-Pharmacologic Approaches To Pain
Addiction, Physical Dependence and Tolerance
Addiction to narcotics is rare (less than 1% of patients) and usually occurs in patients with a prior history of substance abuse. Addiction is defined as the continued use of a specific psychoactive substance despite physical, psychological or social harm.
Physical dependence differs from addiction. Patients taking opioids on a chronic basis develop a physical dependence, and experience withdrawal symptoms during sudden abstinence from the drug. Addiction is primarily a psychological problem; dependence is a physical response to continued use of narcotics.
Tolerance is the need for higher opioid doses to maintain a constant effect. While this is a poorly understood phenomenon, most patients on chronic opioids do not experience tolerance. Alternative explanations, such as a new source of pain or progression of an existing lesion (especially a neoplasm), should be considered when tolerance occurs.
Addiction is a maladaptive behavior pattern, where the need to take a drug interferes with other life activities. The individual is preoccupied with a continuing drug supply, despite deterioration of family, work, and other social relationships. Addiction should be suspected if concurrent use of alcohol or illicit drugs, frequent visits to the ER seeking additional medications, forging or losing prescriptions, repeated noncompliance with medication regimens, and/or the unwillingness to discuss changes in pain medication are present. These are difficult patients to deal with and often psychiatry or chronic pain consultation is helpful.
Use of opioids in patients with a history of substance abuse is occasionally necessary. In these cases, a treatment contract should be utilized. This typically sets out basic terms, such as the single physician who will prescribe medication, the medication schedule that the patient is expected to adhere to, and the conditions which will lead to discontinuation of narcotic therapy.
Pseudoaddiciton must be differentiated from true addiction. Patients experiencing continued pain will exhibit anxiety and drug-seeking behavior. These behaviors typically disappear once the pain is relieved. This pseudoaddictive behavior is extinguished by adequate pain relief, unlike the continued drug-seeking behavior of true addiction.
Part 5 Pediatric Pain Management staff education
Top Ten things you need to know about pediatric pain management:
Barriers to Effective Pain Management
Provider Barriers (Pain Management in Children with Cancer, Texas Cancer Center, 1999)
MYTH: Young Infants do not feel pain. Children’s nervous systems are immature and are unable to perceive and experience pain the way adults do. (Texas Cancer Council, 1999)
FACT: The Central nervous system of a 26 week old fetus possess the anatomical and neurochemical capabilities of experiencing nociception (Anand, 1998)
MYTH: Children easily become addicted to narcotics.
FACT: Less than 1% of children treated with opioids (Narcotics) develop addiction. (Foley, 1996)
MYTH: Children tolerate pain better than adults.
FACT: Younger children experience higher levels of pain during procedures than older children. Children’s tolerance for pain increases with age. (Bromme, Rehwalt and Fogg, 1998; Broome and others 1990)
MYTH: Children are unable to tell you where they hurt.
FACT: Children may not be able to express their pain in the same manner as adults. Children are able to point to eh body area where they are experiencing pain or draw a picture illustrating their perception of pain.
MYTH: Children become accustomed to pain or painful procedures.
FACT: Children exposed to repeated painful procedures often experience increasing anxiety and perception of pain with repeated procedures (Zeltzer, 1990).
MYTH: Children will tell you when they are experiencing pain.
FACT: Children may not report pain due to fear of administration of a painful analgesic (injection) or fear of returning to the hospital. Children who have experienced chronic pain may not be aware that they are experiencing pain. Young children may not have adequate communication skills or others may not think it is necessary to tell health professionals about the pain (Favaloro and Touzel, 1990).
MYTH: Children’s behaviors reflect their pain intensity.
FACT: Children are unique in their ways of coping. Children’s behavior is not a specific indication of their pain level (Beyer, McGrath and Berde, 1990).
Basic Concepts of Pain Management
It is very important to know and recognize the patient’s physiological, psychological, and emotional responses to pain when developing a pain management plan. Without addressing these important issues, it is often difficult to develop an adequate pain treatment plan.
Changes in vital signs do not occur with all patients who are experiencing severe pain. Do not rely on vital signs to determine the severity of a patient’s pain.
Patients with pain, even severe pain, can be distracted from thinking about their pain, and may even be able to sleep. Don’t trust that a patient isn’t having pain because he "looks comfortable." Always ask, and believe the patient’s assessment of his own pain.
Treat the pain, reassess frequently, and continue to treat until the patient is comfortable or side effects prevent further treatment. If this occurs, consult a pain expert- don’t leave a patient in pain without a treatment plan.
Chronic pain patients are usually on a specific regimen of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapy. This regimen must be continued during their hospitalization. Superimposed acute pain (e.g. acute postoperative pain) should be treated with additional opioids (narcotics).
Assessment and Documentation
Pain Assessment
A physician, nurse, and/or other health care professional should identify the presence of pain for each patient encounter at UMHHC. If pain is present, its intensity is scored, typically using a standardized 0 to 10 scale. (See "pain scales" below). Pain scores are documented in writing, just like vital signs, making them readily available to all members of the health care team. The JCAHO actually suggests that pain should be thought of as the 5th vital sign.
In the hospital setting, the patient’s pain is assessed at least as often as vital signs are taken, because ongoing assessment is necessary to evaluate changes in pain and the effectiveness of its treatment. Pain should be assessed at intervals appropriate to the severity of pain and the patient’s situation. For many patients, this will mean assessment of pain every 4 hours, but the time between assessments must be individualized to the patient’s need.
In the ambulatory care setting, pain assessment should be completed with every new episode of care. Repeated visits or contacts for the same problem may not require repeated pain assessments (unless a current pain problem is being followed).
Pediatric Pain assessment should be appropriate to the developmental level. All pediatric patients should be assessed for pain. Pain can be communicated by words, expressions, and behavior (crying, guarding a body part, grimacing).
Using the QUEST Principles of pain assessment (Baker and Wong, 1987) may be helpful in assessing pediatric pain.
Question the child.
Use pain rating scales.
Evaluate behavior and physiological changes.
Secure parent’s involvement.
Take cause of pain into account.
Take action and evaluate results.
Neonates:
Situations that are painful for older children and adults can be expected to be painful for babies. Neonates that are ill may not be able to cry.
|
Signs Of Acute Pain |
Signs of Chronic Pain |
|
Crying and moaning |
Apathy |
|
Muscle rigidity |
Irritability |
|
Flexion or flailing of the extremities |
Changes in sleeping and eating patterns |
|
Diaphoresis |
A lack of interest in their surroundings |
|
Irritability |
|
|
Guarding |
|
|
Changes in vital signs, and pupillary dilatation |
Older Children:
Children less than 3 years old or unable to communicate, clinicians should use the FLACC scale.
Children over 3 may use the Faces scale. The clinician can create this at the bedside with a pencil and paper and draw different faces.
Children over 5 may be able to use descriptor words (stinging, burning).
Children over 6, who understand the concepts of rank and order, can use numerical scale.
Factors Influencing Pain Ratings:
Because each child may regress when they are in pain, it is important to use whatever tool meets the cognitive level of the child.
Children may fear consequences (e.g., physical exam or injection) if they admit to having pain.
Children may not understand the relationship between pain assessment, treatment and the relief of pain.
Observation of behavior is a complimentary way to evaluate pain as well. Including the patient’s family or guardian may help in the assessment of pain. Observation is the only way to assess a non-communicative child.
Pain Scales
Scales should be developmentally, physically, emotionally and cognitively appropriate for the given patient.
Suggested standardized tools with 0 to 10 scoring are listed below. Other scales may be adopted for specific UMHHC units.
(See the instructions and illustrations that follow.)
Numeric Rating Scale
Ask the patient to rate their pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable). Some patients are unable to do this with only verbal instructions, but may be able to look at a number scale and point to the number that describes the intensity of their pain.
Color Scale
This scale is a colored stripe in which color gradually changes from white (no pain) through shades of pink to dark red (worst possible pain). Ask the patient to point to the area on the scale that shows their level of pain. To obtain a number for documentation use the scale parallel to the color stripe to find the number corresponding to the area where the patient points.

Word Graphic Scale
This scale can be used with patient as young as 6 years of age. It uses a line with words to describe pain intensity from "no pain" to "worst possible pain". Show and explain the scale to the patient and then ask him or her to point (or mark) anywhere along the line that shows how much pain they have. To find a number for documentation count the black dots, starting with zero at the far left, to the area where
the patient points, up to ten at the far right.
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale

From Wong DL, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML, Ahmann E, DiVito-Thomas PA: Whaley and Wong’s Nursing Care of Infants and Children, ed. 6, St. Louis, 1999, Mosby, p. 1153.
This scale can be used with young children (sometimes as young as 3 years of age). It also works well for many older children and adults as well as for those who speak a different language. Explain that each face represents a person who may have no pain, some pain, or as much pain as imaginable. Point to the appropriate face and say:
(0) "This face is happy and does not hurt at all."
(2) "This face hurts just a little bit."
(4) "This face hurts a little more."
(6) "This face hurts even more."
(8) "This face hurts a whole lot."
(10) "This face hurts as much as you can imagine, but you don’t have to be crying to feel this bad."
Ask the patient to choose the face that best matches how she or he feels or how much they hurt.
FLACC Scale
This is a behavior scale that has been tested with children age 3 months to 7 years. Each of the five categories (Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) is scored from 0-2 and the scores are added to get a total from 0-10. Behavioral pain scores need to be considered within the context of the child’s physiological status, anxiety and other environmental factors.

Pain Documentation
Pain assessment results can be charted in a variety of places:
Inpatient:
Place pain score below the charting area for vital signs. Updates can be entered every hour. (See sample)
On the reverse side of the flow sheet is an area labeled "cognitive/perceptual" or "rest and comfort". (See sample) This charting space allows documentation of pain score, comfort level AND patient satisfaction with their current level of pain. Any additional information can be noted in the "other" section at the bottom of this page.
When a PCA or Epidural is being utilized, pain scores can be documented here.
The note may indicate the intensity and characteristics of the patient’s pain, along with current treatment and future pain plan.
Ambulatory care
1) Clinic notes
Classification of Pain by Inferred Pathology
Two Major types of Pain
a. Somatic Pain b. Visceral Pain |
a. Centrally Generated Pain b. Peripherally Generated Pain |
1. Tumor involvement of the organ capsule that causes aching and fairly well-localized pain. 2. Obstruction of hollow viscus, which causes intermittent cramping and poorly localized pain. |
1. Deafferentation pain. Injury to either the peripheral or central nervous system. Examples: Phantom pain may reflect injury to the peripheral nervous system; burning pain below the level of a spinal cord lesion reflects injury to the central nervous system.
1. Painful polyneuropathies. Pain is felt along the distribution of many peripheral nerves. Examples" Diabetic neuropathy, alcohol-nutritional neuropathy, and those associated with Guillain-Barre’ syndrome. 2. Painful neuropathies. Usually associated with a known peripheral nerve injury, and pain is felt at least partly along the distribution of the damaged nerve. Examples: nerve root compression, nerve entrapment, trigeminal neuralgia. |
From McCaffery M, Pasero C: Pain: Clinical manual, p 19. Copyright 1999, Mosby, Inc.
BASIC PHARMACOLOGIC PAIN MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES
|
Pain Severity |
Analgesic Choice |
Examples |
|
Mild (pain score 1-3) |
Acetaminophen, Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Agents |
TylenolÒ , ibuprofen (MotrinÒ ), naproxen (NaprosynÒ ) |
|
Moderate (pain score 4-6) |
IV Ketorolac, oral acetaminophen/opioid combinations |
ToradolÒ , VicodinÒ , TyloxÒ , TylenolÒ with codeine #3 |
|
Severe (pain score 7-10) |
Opioid |
Morphine, hydromorphone (DilaudidÒ ), fentanyl |
Use Of The Equianalgesic Table
APPROXIMATE OPIOID EQUIANALGESIC DOSES (PEDIATRIC)***
|
DRUG |
DOSE (mg) Parenteral |
DOSE (mg) Oral |
DURATION (hour) |
|
Morphine |
1 |
3 a |
4 -6 |
|
Morphine – Sustained Release (MS Contin, Oramorph SR) |
--- |
3 |
8 –12 |
|
Morphine – Sustained Release (Kadian) |
--- |
3 |
24 |
|
Hydromorphone (Dilaudid) |
0.15 |
0.75 |
4 - 5 |
|
Meperidine (Demerol) b |
7.5 |
30 |
2 - 4 |
|
Fentanyl (Sublimaze) |
0.01 |
1 |
|
|
Codeine c (Tylenol with codeine #2, #3 or #4) |
12 |
20 |
4 - 6 |
|
Hydrocodone d (Vicodin, Lortab) |
--- |
3 |
4 - 6 |
|
Oxycodone e (Percodan, Percocet, Tylox, Roxicet, Roxicodone)) |
--- |
3 |
4 - 6 |
|
Oxycodone Controlled Release (Oxycontin) |
--- |
3 |
8 - 12 |
|
Methadone (Dolophine) f |
0.3 |
4 – 8 |
|
|
These following agents are NOT opioids. In general, they are weaker analgesics. The equianalgeisa dose is for information only and, with the exception of ketorolac, it is NOT a reasonable or appropriate dose. |
|||
|
Ketorolac (Toradol) |
1-3 |
1 |
6 |
|
Ibuprofen (Motrin) |
--- |
130 |
6 – 8 |
|
Acetaminophen (Tylenol) |
--- |
390 |
4 |
a IM:PO ratio is 1:6 (1mg IM = 6mg po) with single or intermittent dosing. With chronic dosing, the ratio changes to 1:3 (1mg IM = 3mg po).
b Not recommended for pain management. Keep doses under 600mg/day and do not use for > 48 hours.
c Most preparations contain either 15, 30 or 60mg of codeine with 300mg acetaminophen. Do not exceed 75mg/kg/day or 2.6 grams/day in children under 12 years of age. Do not exceed 4 grams/day of acetaminophen in children > 12 years of age.
d Preparations contain either 5, 7.5 or 10mg of hydrocodone in combination with acetaminophen (500, 650 or 750mg). Do not exceed 75mg/kg/day or 2.6 grams/day in children under 12 years of age. Do not exceed 4 grams/day of acetaminophen in children > 12 years of age.
e Preparations contain 5mg oxycodone in combination with acetaminophen (325 or 500mg). Do not exceed 75mg/kg/day or 2.6 grams/day in children under 12 years of age. Do not exceed 4 grams/day of acetaminophen in children > 12 years of age.
f Methadone is much more potent than previously described in the literature and it accumulates with repeated dosing. A highly individual and cautious approach when switching from another potent opioid must be taken. Please consult the Acute Pain Service.
Equianalgesic Dose Conversion Formula ***
Dose for current drug (from equianalgesic chart) 24-hour dose of current drug (scheduled and rescue doses)
----------------------------------------------------------------- = ------------------------------------------------------
Dose for new drug (from equianalgesic chart) 24-hour dose of new drug
* ** This table is 1/10 of the value of the equianalgesic doses for adults. These are NOT suggested starting doses; these are doses of opioids that produce approximately the same amount of analgesia. Published trials vary in the suggested doses that are equianalgesic to morphine. By using this table, you can determine a dose of a new opioid and/or route of administration that is approximately equal in analgesic effect to the dose of the former opioid. Titration to clinical response is necessary. Recommended doses do not apply to patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency or other conditions affecting drug metabolism and kinetics.
Selected References:
Principles of Analgesic Use in the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain, American Pain Society, 1999
Acute Pain Management in Adults: Operative Procedures. Quick Reference Guide for Clinicians. AHCPR Pub. No. 92-0019. 1992
Micromedex ® Healthcare Series Drugdex Drug Evaluations
Preventing and Managing Common Opioid Side Effects
The use of opioids is associated with the occurrence of drug side effects, which become more common as doses of opioids are increased to treat severe pain. These side effects include nausea and vomiting, constipation, pruritus (itching), mental confusion, sedation, respiratory depression and hypersensitivity reactions. Proper use of opioids includes management of these side effects, rather than discontinuation of opioids in a patient with severe pain.
Non-Pharmacologic Approaches to Pain
Cognitive-behavioral
Physical
Nonpharmacologic interventions may be provided, based on training, by:
Addiction, Physical Dependence and Tolerance
Addiction to narcotics is rare (less than 1% of patients) and usually occurs in-patients with a prior history of substance abuse. Addiction is defined as the continued use of a specific psychoactive substance despite physical, psychological or social harm.
Physical dependence differs from addiction. Patients taking opioids on a chronic basis develop a physical dependence, and experience withdrawal symptoms during sudden abstinence from the drug. Addiction is primarily a psychological problem; dependence is a physical response to continued use of narcotics.
Tolerance is the need for higher opioid doses to maintain a constant effect. While this is a poorly understood phenomenon, most patients on chronic opioids do not experience tolerance. Alternative explanations, such as a new source of pain or progression of an existing lesion (especially a neoplasm), should be considered when tolerance occurs.
Addiction is a maladaptive behavior pattern, where the need to take a drug interferes with other life activities. The individual is preoccupied with a continuing drug supply, despite deterioration of family, work, and other social relationships. Addiction should be suspected if concurrent use of alcohol or illicit drugs, frequent visits to the ER seeking additional medications, forging or losing prescriptions, repeated noncompliance with medication regimens, and/or the unwillingness to discuss changes in pain medication are present. These are difficult patients to deal with and often psychiatry or chronic pain consultation is helpful.
Use of opioids in-patients with a history of substance abuse is occasionally necessary. In these cases, a treatment contract should be utilized. This typically sets out basic terms, such as the single physician who will prescribe medication, the medication schedule that the patient is expected to adhere to, and the conditions which will lead to discontinuation of narcotic therapy.
Pseudoaddiciton must be differentiated from true addiction. Patients experiencing continued pain will exhibit anxiety and drug-seeking behavior. These behaviors typically disappear once the pain is relieved. This pseudoaddictive behavior is extinguished by adequate pain relief, unlike the continued drug-seeking behavior of true addiction.
References: