UMHS logo

RETURN TO PRESS RELEASE PAGE
link - UMHS HOME link UMHS HOME

show recent releases on:

search all press releases:

Help with Searching
 

June 26, 2003

Landmark study finds American adults often fail to get recommended care, posing 'serious threats' to health

Contact information for:
JOURNALISTS & MEDIA


Information for:
PATIENTS, FAMILIES & HEALTH PROFESSIONALS




Radio news


Current UMHS News Releases


Past UMHS Releases


UMHS in the media

UM main campus news


 

 


RAND HEALTH - A new RAND Health study that is the largest and most comprehensive examination ever conducted of health care quality in the United States found that adults fail to receive recommended health care nearly half the time.

Researchers at RAND and the University of Michigan Health System noted that the deficiencies in care they found pose "serious threats to the health of the American public" that could contribute to thousands of preventable deaths in the United States each year.

The researchers said their findings shatter the widely held perception that health care quality is not a problem in the United States. In reality, the study found that many people are not receiving appropriate treatment. According to the researchers, these findings are the best estimates ever provided of the seriousness of the quality problem in the United States.

The study - which examined preventive care as well as the management of 30 common health problems such as diabetes, asthma, high blood pressure and heart disease - is to be published Thursday (June 26) in the New England Journal of Medicine.

"Most of us take health care quality for granted," said lead study author Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Ph.D., Associate Director of RAND Health. "This study shows that we can't. There is a tremendous gap between what we know works and what patients are actually getting. Virtually everyone in this country is at risk for poor care."

The study used a unique methodology that involved both random telephone surveys and reviews of patients' medical records. Nearly 7,000 adults in 12 metropolitan areas were interviewed about selected health care experiences. In addition, those interviewed gave written consent for researchers to review their medical records and use the information to evaluate performance on 439 detailed clinical indicators of care for 30 acute and chronic conditions, as well as preventive care.

"This is the most comprehensive study of quality of care ever conducted -- both with respect to the number of conditions examined and the population studied. It examines a broad spectrum of care for a national sample of patients with a variety of insurance arrangements, and finds that on average adults fail to receive many of the recommended processes of care studied," says study co-author Eve Kerr, M.D., M.P.H., assistant professor of Internal Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School.

Most other studies have assessed a single condition, focused on a small number of indicators of quality, looked at care in one geographic area, or assessed people with a single type of insurance coverage. This study looks at how health care across the nation is being provided and cuts across all geographic areas, insurance types and a wide range of conditions.

"For the nation to make serious progress on quality, we must have routinely available, at every level in the health care system, the type of information produced for this study," noted David Lawrence, M.D., retired Chairman and CEO of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan and Hospitals. "The methods developed at RAND represent the gold standard for future assessments of health care quality."

Quality varied substantially according to medical condition, ranging from 79 percent of recommended care for cataracts among older people to 11 percent of recommended care for people with alcohol dependence. Among the key findings:

  • People with diabetes received only 45 percent of the care they need. For example, less than one-quarter of diabetics had their blood sugar levels measured regularly. Poor control of blood sugar can lead to kidney failure, blindness and amputation of limbs.

  • People with coronary artery disease received 68 percent of recommended care, but just 45 percent of heart attack patients received medications that could reduce their risk of death by more that 20 percent.

  • Patients with pneumonia received just 39 percent of recommended care. In fact, fewer than two-thirds of elderly Americans were vaccinated against pneumonia. Nearly 10,000 deaths from pneumonia could be prevented annually through proper vaccinations.

  • Patients with colorectal cancer received 54 percent of recommended care, but just 38 percent of adults were screened for colorectal cancer. Routine tests and appropriate follow-up could prevent 9,600 deaths a year.

  • Patients with high blood pressure received less than 65 percent of recommended care. Poor blood pressure control is associated with increased risk for heart disease, stroke and death. In fact, poor blood pressure control contributes to more than 68,000 preventable deaths annually.

Similar levels of deficiencies were found across preventive, acute, and chronic care. Underuse of care was greater than overuse. Patients failed to receive recommended care approximately 46 percent of the time, compared with 11 percent of the time when they received care that was not recommended and potentially harmful. Overall, patients received 55 percent of recommended care.

"Even people who had health insurance and access to health care services failed to receive some elements of good care," McGlynn said. "This suggests that just being able to get in the door to see a doctor is no guarantee that you'll receive the care you need."

McGlynn and her colleagues noted that these deficiencies appeared despite concerted efforts in recent years by both the federal government and the private sector to improve health care delivery. The researchers said that key to any future progress will be the routine availability of information on health care performance at all levels.

"Making such information available will require a major overhaul of our current health information systems, with a focus on automating the entry and retrieval of key data for clinical decision making and for the measurement and reporting of quality," the researchers wrote.

Collaborating on the study were: McGlynn; Kerr; Steven M. Asch, M.D., M.P.H. (RAND, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, University of California Los Angeles); John Adams, Ph.D. (RAND); Joan Keesey, B.A. (RAND); Jennifer Hicks, Ph.D. (RAND); and Alison DeCristofaro, M.P.H. (RAND).

The study was funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). Established in 1972, RWJF is the nation's largest philanthropy devoted exclusively to health and health care. Drs. Asch and Kerr were supported by the Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development program.

RAND Health is the nation's largest independent health-policy research organization, with a broad research portfolio that focuses on medical quality, health-care costs and delivery of health care, among other topics.


Contact:
Jennifer Hudman
301-652-1558

 

E-mail this information to a friend


Recent Press Releases

 


U-M Medical School
| Hospitals & Health Centers | U-M | TEXT-ONLY

University of Michigan Health System
1500 E. Medical Center Drive  Ann Arbor, MI 48109   734-936-4000
(c) copyright 2008 Regents of the University of Michigan
Developed & maintained by: Public Relations & Marketing Communications
Contact UMHS

U.S. News: America's Best Hospital 2007
The University of Michigan Health System web site does not provide specific medical advice and does not endorse any medical or professional service obtained through information provided on this site or any links to this site.
Complete disclaimer and Privacy Statement

UMHS HOME

Health Topics A-Z

For Patients & Families

For Health Professionals

Search Tools & Index