|
||
|
||
|
CHICAGO - Doctors today know more than ever about what drugs, treatments and lifestyle changes can help heart attack patients live longer and healthier lives after they leave the hospital. But amazingly enough, as many as half of such patients may not get the prescriptions, tests and counseling they need.
By incorporating a system of reminders, standing orders and checklists into routine care, the study shows, hospitals significantly improved the percentage of patients receiving certain proven treatments and lifestyle counseling. After the system was put in place, the study shows, there were jumps in the use of individual treatments that ranged in size from 5.6 percentage points to 34.8 percentage points. The new results come from the latest phase of a study sponsored by the American College of Cardiology and led by members of the Michigan ACC chapter under the direction of researchers at the University of Michigan Cardiovascular Center. They will be presented at the ACC's 52nd Annual Scientific Session meeting in Chicago. Note to editors: An ACC press conference will be held at 12:30 p.m. CT on 3/30.
The study, called ACC AMI GAP for the ACC's Acute Myocardial Infarction Guidelines Applied in Practice, seeks to find ways to help doctors and hospitals deliver the care outlined in heart attack care guidelines developed by the ACC and the American Heart Association. The guidelines are based on the best available evidence of what drugs, tests and lifestyle changes (such as smoking cessation and diet modification) work best for patients, preventing complications and recurrences.
The new results combine the data collected in three stages of the GAP project: a pilot study in 10 hospitals in southeast Michigan, a phase II study in five hospitals in the Flint/Saginaw region of Michigan, and a phase III study in 19 more southeast Michigan hospitals including UMHS. The study hospitals were of all different sizes and types, from small community facilities to major urban and tertiary-care medical centers. Both teaching and non-teaching hospitals were included, and patients had various forms of insurance - about 70 percent were on Medicare.
All hospitals were offered a "toolkit" of reminders, checklists, stickers, standard orders, reference cards and educational materials that made it easier for doctors, nurses and patients to follow the ACC's guidelines. The degree to which the care system was incorporated into each hospital varied. Some improvement was seen even in the hospitals that didn't use the toolkit very often - for instance, an increase of about 7 percentage points was seen in prescriptions for aspirin and beta blockers that were written before patients left the hospital. But in hospitals that consistently used the tools, the gains were much greater. Use of aspirin and beta blockers early in a patient's hospital stay increased 6.6 points and 5.6 points, respectively. Pre-discharge prescriptions for the same drugs rose 12.4 points and 6.3 points, respectively. There was also a 7.7 percentage point increase in prescriptions for ACE inhibitor drugs given before patients went home. And a 9.6 percentage point jump in cholesterol tests was also seen. The biggest gains were in the area of diet and smoking-cessation counseling, and in prescriptions for cholesterol-lowering drugs, which rose by 14.3 points. A 34.8 point jump in the proportion of patients who got advice about stopping smoking, and a 21.6 point rise in the percentage who saw a dietitian or nutritionist before they went home, show how far hospitals have to go in helping patients understand the lifestyle changes that can help their health. Eagle notes that none of the therapies was used in 100 percent of patients - the highest percentage achieved was 94 percent, for pre-discharge aspirin. But not every patient needs every therapy - for instance, non-smokers don't need advice on stopping smoking, and patients who are already taking blood-thinning drugs should generally not take aspirin, too. Eagle emphasizes
that the ACC guidelines, and the GAP toolkit that incorporates them, aren't
a "cookbook" for cookie-cutter medicine. "These tools,
and the processes that lead to their consistent use, simply function as
a reminder system," he says. "These are key things that need
to be thought about and either ordered or ruled out because of a contraindication.
We want to help doctors, nurses, and patients consider the priorities
and follow them if indicated." In addition to Eagle and Montoye, the authors of the new study include Anthony DeFranco, Arthur Riba, Robert Parrish, Jessica Paul, Patricia L. Baker, and Rajendra Mehta, M.D., a clinical assistant professor of cardiology who has helped lead the study. The hospitals
in the study were: Background on
heart attack and heart attack treatment: The quality of care that patients receive in the minutes, hours, days and months after their heart attacks varies widely from hospital to hospital, state to state, and person to person. The result: wide variation in patients' survival, complication and recurrence rates, and quality of life. Sizable variations by age, sex, race and geographic location have been seen. The ACC developed its heart attack guidelines in collaboration with the American Heart Association to address such disparities. Based on solid medical evidence about the effectiveness of drugs, tests, interventions and other techniques, and updated regularly, the guidelines serve as a "gold standard" for emergency, hospital and follow-up care. Available on the Internet, the guidelines give recommendations for the treatments, tests and advice that patients should get based on their age, sex, medical history and the severity of their condition. Tools in the GAP Initiative "Tool Kit" (available online at www.acc.org):
Guideline-recommended therapies, tests and counseling measured in the study:
Written by: Kara Gavin
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|||||||||