CHEAR - National Poll on Children's Health
C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health
A publication from the University of Michigan Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases and the University of Michigan Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Unit.
Vol. 2, Issue 2; November 12, 2007
Do High Gas Prices Lead to Less Health Care for Kids? PDF
Do High Gas Prices Lead to Less Health Care for Kids?
Health Minute
Press release
Online video
Podcast
Report Highlights
- 6% of parents report that they have
postponed a medical visit or medications
for their children because of high gas
prices in 2007. - Nearly two-thirds of US parents would apply to a program that would provide “gas cards” to help get to their children’s health care visits.
- Adults think that gas/oil companies and the government should fund a “gas card” program.
The average price of gas in the US is higher than ever
before — $2.74 per gallon so far in 2007, compared with
$2.57 in 2006 and $2.27 in 2005. Gas prices as a national
average first reached $3.00 per gallon for a single week in
2005. Since then, Americans have had to pay more than
$3.00 per gallon for 4 weeks in 2006, and for 8 weeks
already in 2007.
That all adds up to a lot of pain in the pocketbook, trying
to make ends meet. A concern of health care providers is
that higher gas prices may discourage people from getting
the medical care and medications they need.
Postponing Medical Visits and Medicines Because of Higher Gas Prices
In July and August 2007, the CS Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health conducted a study to find out how higher gas prices were affecting families’ ability to get health care and medications. Another goal of the study was also to find out what Americans thought of a possible program that would provide “gas cards” to families, to help pay the costs of taking their kids to health care visits and who should pay for the program.
Results from the Poll indicate that, specifically because of gas prices in 2007, 6% of parents report that they have postponed a medical visit for their children or postponed buying medications. Low-income and middle-income parents were substantially more likely than higher-income parents to say they had postponed children’s health care because of high gas prices this year (Figure 1).
To get to their children’s health care appointments, most parents (57%) travel 10 miles or less. But 29% travel 11-20 miles and 12% travel more than 20 miles. This travel distance was strongly linked to whether parents reported postponing their children’s health care visits or buying medications. Those who must travel further were much more likely to say they had postponed medical visits or medications because of high gas prices in 2007 (Figure 2).
Parents with chronic illness themselves were also
more likely to say they had postponed their
children’s medical visits or medications. Also,
families in the Midwest were more than twice as
likely to postpone children’s medical visits as families
in other regions of the country.
Support for a Gas Card Program
53% of US adults think that there should be a program to provide assistance in the form of “gas cards” to help families get to children’s health care visits. This idea was more strongly supported by women, lower-income adults, and adults with chronic diseases. Even among respondents who did not have children in the household, more than half support a gas card program.
Among parents, 64% overall said they would apply for a gas card to help pay for transportation to take their children to health care visits. Parents with lower annual income were much more likely than higher-income parents to say they would apply for such a program (Figure 3).
Nearly all parents (90%) who postponed health care for their children said they would apply for gas cards. In addition, parents who needed to travel farther to take their children to health care appointments were more likely to say they would apply for gas cards: 76% among parents who travel more than 20 miles, compared with 68% who travel 11-20 miles and 57% who travel 10 miles or less.
Who Should Pay for a Gas Card Program?
Adults were somewhat divided over who they thought should pay for a gas card program. Gas/oil companies and the government were most commonly selected as funding sources (Figure 4).
Implications
This year Americans have had to pay more for
gasoline than ever before. Results from this CS Mott
Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health
indicate that higher gas prices are putting the squeeze
on how parents are managing health care for their
children — either in getting to visits or purchasing
medications. This is a highly concerning phenomenon
that will only get worse if gas prices continue to rise.
The dilemma of paying for gas or paying for health
care is particularly tough for lower-income American
families, and for families who need to drive longer-than-average
distances health care visits. At the national
level, these poll findings indicate that over 4 million
children have had a doctor visit or medications
postponed because of high gas prices. For these
reasons, a voucher program dedicated to helping
families get children to health care is appealing to the
majority of American adults, even those without children
in the household.
One-half of adults favor government sponsorship of a “gas card” program, but even more would like to see gas
and oil corporations give back to their communities by
providing gas cards explicitly for the purpose of
transportation for children’s health care. Nearly
two-thirds of parents said they would apply for gas cards
if there were a program, and more than 4 out of every 5
with household incomes of less than $30,000 would plan
to do so. A “gas card for child health” program would support families’ efforts to safeguard their children’s
health and also allow corporations the opportunity to do
good while doing well.
Datasource
This report presents findings from a nationally representative
household survey conducted exclusively by Knowledge Networks,
Inc, for C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital. The survey was administered
from July 20-August 9, 2007, to a randomly selected, stratified group
of adults aged 18 and older (n=2,060) with and without children from
the Knowledge Networks standing panel that closely resembles the
U.S. population. The sample was subsequently weighted to reflect
U.S. population figures from the Census Bureau. The response rate
was 71% among Knowledge Networks panel members contacted to
participate.
C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health
Director: Matthew M. Davis, MD, MAPP,
Associate Professor of Pediatrics,
Internal Medicine and Public Policy
Associate Director: Sarah J. Clark, MPH
Manager & Editor: Dianne C. Singer, MPH
Data Analyst: Acham Gebremariam, MS
Faculty Collaborator: Chris Dickinson, MD
Contact us! Email: NPCH@med.umich.edu
Reports
Please contact us for more information or if you would like to be added to our mailing list to receive future Reports (please mark "subscribe" in the subject line of your e-mail).
This Report includes research findings from the C.S. Mott Children's National Poll on Children's Health, which do not represent the opinions of the investigators or the opinions of the University of Michigan. The University of Michigan reserves all rights over this material.





