![]() |
|
|
|
Ragavendra
R. Baliga, M.D
|
Question 9 of 39: It is universal practice to administer oxygen because it has been well documented this therapy limits myocardial damage, reduce morbidity and mortality. You clicked 'True' Incorrect! Although it has become universal practice to administer oxygen, usually by nasal prongs to virtually all patients suspected of having acute ischemic-type chest discomfort, it is not known whether this therapy limits myocardial damage or reduces morbidity or mortality. When oxygen saturation is <90% therapy with supplemental oxygen is clearly indicated. Laboratory data suggests that breathing oxygen may limit ischemic myocardial injury[1] and there is evidence that oxygen administration reduces ST-segment elevation in patients with MI[2]. The rationale for use of oxygen is based on the observation that even with uncomplicated myocardial infarction, some patients are modestly hypoxemic initially, presumably because of ventilation-perfusion mismatch and excessive lung water[3].
Reference: 1. Maroko PR, Radvany P, Braunwald E, Hale SL. Reduction of infarct size by oxygen inhalation following acute coronary occlusion. Circulation 1975;52:360-368 2. Madias JE, Hood WB Jr. Reduction of precordial ST-segment elevation in patients with anterior myocardial infarction by oxygen breathing. Circulation 1976;53 (suppl I):I-198-I-200. 3. Fillmore SJ, Shapiro M, Killip T. Arterial oxygen tension in acute myocardial infarction: serial analysis of clinical state and blood gas changes. Am Heart J 1970;79:620-629. |
|
|
Produced
by the Learning Resource Center Office of Medical Education University
of Michigan Medical School
Copyright 2001 by the University of Michigan Board of Regents. All rights reserved. |