ORIO Guidance: Miscellaneous Information

Guidance on Routine Reporting of Audits, Inspections, Reports and Correspondence to/from Oversight Bodies/Agencies/Entity

Investigators and research staff are expected to cooperate with evaluations, inspections, and audits performed by authorized internal oversight authorities, including the IRB, the Office for Human Research Compliance Review (OHRCR), Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office and the Office of University Audits. Cooperation is also expected for external reviews (e.g., by Entities such as industry sponsors or Government Agencies such as the FDA, NCI or NIH Office of Research Integrity). Any internal or external investigation, inspection or other review and its outcome must be reported to the IRB responsible for the research in question. Researchers should consult with their administrators, the IRBs, MICHR, and as appropriate the Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) and/or General Counsel for assistance and representation.

Reports to or from oversight bodies, agencies or entities should be submitted to the IRBMED for review according to the table below for Adverse Events (AEs) or Other Reportable Information or Occurrences (ORIOs); OR as required in the IRBMED approved Study Specific Adverse Event Reporting Timetable which may allow for non-concurrent reporting.

Examples:

 

Event or Information

Timing of Report to IRBMED

Notification of any of any Audit and/or Inspection

As soon as possible after notification of the audit and/or prior to a site visit by a sponsor.

 

 

 

If one of the following criteria applies:

 

Within 7 DAYS

Within 14 DAYS

Prior to Next SCR

Any of the following to and/or from Oversight Bodies / Agencies / Entities:

  • General Summary
  • Annual Reports
  • Reports / letters
  • Audit and/or Inspection Reports
  • Voluntary Hold of some or all study activities

urgent subject safety issue(s)
regulatory concerns

  • serious and suggests research may place subjects or others at greater risk of harm than was previously known or recognized
  • requires a change (amendment) to the research
  • the risk/benefit ratio of the study is changed
  • subjects' willingness to participate is affected
  • PI response to oversight entity
  • when non-serious and suggests research may place subjects or others at greater risk of harm than was previously known or recognized

AND/OR

  • may jeopardize integrity of study results

AND/OR

  • may jeopardize potential benefits to subjects

when ORIO falls outside of other IRB timeframe parameters at the left

 

Back to top

Guidance Updated 7/11/11