Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Project Title:
Living with Cancer: The Quality of Cancer Pain
Management in African Americans
Context:
Cancer related pain is the most common complaint of
cancer patients. Racial and ethnic minorities are at risk for the
under-treatment of cancer pain. When considering the persistence of
healthcare disparities based upon race and ethnicity, especially for cancer,
the presence of cancer pain in this population has significant implications
on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The overriding hypothesis for
this proposal is that breakthrough pain in cancer patients has a greater
negative effect on the HRQOL (i.e., physical, social, and emotional health)
of African Americans when compared to Caucasian Americans.
Objectives:
This study will identify and compare the prevalence,
characteristics, and outcomes of breakthrough pain (a transitory increase in
pain intensity despite a fixed analgesic regimen) in African and Caucasian
Americans with cancer pain. Specifically, it will evaluate and compare
socio-demographic and coping factors that influence the experience of
breakthrough pain in a cancer pain population. Lastly, this study will
investigate and compare the relationship between breakthrough pain and HRQOL,
healthcare utilization, and medical expenditures in African and Caucasian
Americans with cancer pain.
Research Design and
Methods:
The proposed research will prospectively compare the
prevalence and consequences of breakthrough pain (e.g., hospitalizations,
emergency department visits, and physician visits) via semi-structured
interviews (SI) and well-validated survey instruments. To chronicle the
consequences of breakthrough pain, a series of repeated self-administered
questionnaires used to assess HRQOL, pain severity, depression, attitudes
regarding pain, and coping will be mailed to participants in a standardized
format over a six-month period to assess HRQOL. Data on healthcare
utilization, medical expenditures, and breakthrough pain will also be
collected via study-specific diaries. To
enhance the quantitative data, SI will be used to obtain information
regarding physician-patient communication and experience with pain care
services.
Participants:
To facilitate this observational study, subjects with
cancer pain due to advanced breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer
will be recruited from community-based cancer centers. A cohort of African
Americans with cancer pain (study group; n = 100) will be compared to a
cohort of Caucasian Americans with cancer pain (comparison group; n = 100).
Expected Outcomes/Results:
This health services research study will be the first of
its kind to offer prospective data on the impact of breakthrough pain on
HRQOL, healthcare utilization, and medical expenditures in African Americans
with cancer pain. If our hypotheses are correct, we expect to establish the
presence of race and ethnic-based “pain care gap”. Ultimately, new
knowledge about the HRQOL outcome variables that are most affected in
African Americans with breakthrough pain due to cancer will encourage the
development of specific strategies designed to enhance cancer pain
management which will improve the health of African Americans and other
vulnerable populations with cancer pain.
AETNA
Project Title:
The Health Outcomes and Quality
of Care of African Americans Living With Chronic Pain
Context:
Chronic pain (CP) has significant health effects.
African Americans (AA) may differentially experience more impairment due to
CP than Caucasian Americans (CA).
Objectives:
This study is closely aligned with the Quality Care
Research Fund and Aetna’s goal to improve the health of Americans and to
eliminate healthcare disparities. It will prospectively explore the
effects of CP on overall health and QOL (i.e., emotional, physical, and
social health) as well as evaluate the quality of care (QOC) that AA with CP
receive
Research Design and
Method:
This prospective longitudinal
cohort study will compare AA with CP (study group) to CA with CP who are
matched by gender (control group) for six months. We will test the general
hypothesis that the presence of CP has a greater negative impact on overall
health and QOL of AA than upon CA. The specific aims of this study are to:
1) evaluate the overall health status and QOL of AA with CP, 2) identify
potential socio-demographic and behavioral factors that influence coping
with CP, and 3) evaluate the QOC received by AA with CP. Part I of the
study will chronicle the CP experience of AA by using a battery of
well-validated survey instruments. Part II consists of two-structured
telephone interviews (SI) designed to evaluate QOC prior to being seen at
the Multidisciplinary Pain Center (MPC) and at the conclusion of the study
Patients and Other
Participants:
AA and CA subjects with CP age 18-55 years, who are
seeking treatment at the MPC will be studied
Main Outcome Measure(s):
The differential effects of CP on health status and QOL
Expected
Outcomes/Results:
This health services research study will be the first to
offer quantitative and qualitative data regarding the QOL and QOC of AA
living with CP. The potential benefits of studying CP in AA have tremendous
public health implications. We expect to establish the presence of a “pain
care” gap based on race. New knowledge about the differential effects of CP
in AA will encourage the development of specific healthcare strategies
designed to address these factors. It will extend the existing pain
literature and scientific knowledge by examining the influence of
race/ethnicity on CP while providing a preliminary understanding of how AA
are differentially impacted by the presence of CP.
Geriatric Center, Hartford and Claude Pepper
Center
Title of Project:
Health Outcomes and Quality of Care of Older Women
Living With Chronic Pain
Abstract:
‘Stark differences in the healthcare experience based
upon race, ethnicity, gender, and social stratification exist. Women may
suffer substantially more disability due to chronic pain than men may.
However, little is known about the effects of chronic pain on the health
status, quality of life (QOL i.e., physical, social, and emotional health),
or quality of care received by older women. The proposed research will
provide a preliminary understanding of the potential differential impact of
chronic pain on the health status and QOL of women as well as provide
valuable insight into the quality of care received. This study will recruit
a cohort of women age 50 and older, who have chronic pain (population of
interest) and present at the UM Multidisciplinary Pain Center. A cohort of
women matched by age without chronic pain (control group) obtained from the
human subjects core of the Claude Pepper (i.e., women who have previously
volunteered to participate in research). The subjects will be compared
using quantitative and qualitative methodology. Subjects will receive three
surveys (baseline, three months and six months) and two interviews (baseline
and six months) by phone. Surveys will collect information regarding
physician-patient communication, satisfaction with pain care, coping styles,
coexisting morbidities, support systems, pain characteristics, patient
demographics, environment (e.g., employment), and social behavior (e.g.,
alcohol abuse, tobacco use). Interviews will be used to collect information
on the quality of care that patients receive. The ultimate research goal
is to test the general hypothesis that chronic pain has a negative impact on
the overall health and QOL of older women when compared to a control group.
Michigan Center for Urban African American Aging
Research
Project Title:
Chronic Pain in African American Elders: A Quality of
Life and Mental Health Outcomes Study
Abstract:
Race and age are crucial elements in the consideration
of pain management. Despite the importance of these factors there is a
dearth of knowledge regarding the nature of presenting symptoms, duration of
pain complaints, and level of disability due to chronic pain in African
American (AA) elders. We do not know if the increased depression and anxiety
seen in chronic pain patients may be even more pronounced in AA elders with
chronic pain. Comparisons between Caucasian and AA elders in their
perceptions of pain management and pain belief systems will be considered.
Our study offers the innovative multidisciplinary research that is required
to realize the influences of age and ethnicity on the individual's pain
experience.
Specific Aims:
-
Specific Aim 1.
Hypothesis: There is no difference in pain characteristics, assessment of
pain, health and pain beliefs of AA elders with chronic pain when compared
to CA elders.
-
Specific Aim 2.
Hypothesis: There is no difference in the Quality of Life (QOL) or
disability of AA elders with chronic pain when compared to CA elders.
-
Specific Aim 3.
Hypothesis: There is no difference in the mental health or coping of AA
elders with chronic pain when compared to CA elders.
Lance Armstrong Foundation
Project Title:
Chronic
pain in cancer survivors: Examining disparities and quality of life.
Context:
Pain has been shown to be related to poorer quality of life. Furthermore,
pain is present for 80% of people with cancer and 40% of survivors five
years later. Yet careful studies of pain etiology, characteristics,
treatment and impact on quality of life have not been done. Likewise,
although racial disparities are widely established in other areas of
health and healthcare, disparities have not been examined in relation to
chronic pain (i.e., persisting > 6 months) in cancer survivors. We plan to
address this gap in the literature in the current study.
Objectives:
This study hypothesizes that black cancer survivors have a higher
prevalence of cancer-related chronic pain than whites and that the
etiology and characteristics of chronic pain differ among the two groups.
We hypothesize that the presence of cancer-related chronic pain in cancer
survivors results in worse mental health, diminished functioning and lower
Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL); and that this effect is stronger
for black survivors when compared to white survivors. We further
hypothesize that differences in coping, pain care, attitudes about pain,
and socio-demographic factors between black and white cancer survivors
influence the prevalence of cancer-related chronic pain and mediate the
impact of cancer-related chronic pain on HRQL. Research Design
and Methods:
This study will use a three year, cross-sectional survey design. We will
recruit black and white subjects who are randomly chosen from the Michigan
Cancer Registry, living in the Detroit Metropolitan area which has broad
racial diversity.
Participants:
Subjects will be those who were diagnosed with breast, prostate,
colorectal, and lung cancer or multiple myeloma (N = 220), whether they
currently have cancer or are disease free survivors. Black subjects will
be oversampled if necessary, to ensure equal numbers of blacks and whites
for racial comparisons. We will study the pain experiences of black (study
group; n = 110) and white (comparison group; n = 110) subjects who have
been diagnosed with cancer and have chronic pain for more than two years
but less than ten years.
Expected Outcomes/Results:
Specifically, the proposed research will describe and compare the pain
experience and the consequences of pain in cancer survivors via validated
survey instruments. Socio-demographic information (e.g., age, gender,
residence) cancer etiology and treatment, experiences with pain and pain
care, coping, attitudes about pain care, depression, disability and health
related quality of life (HRQL) will be collected.
Relevance:
With this study we hope establish the prevalence, etiology,
characteristics and impact of pain in people who are cancer survivors and
examine racial differences in pain experiences. This study will provide a
sound basis for educating physicians and cancer survivors about the role
of pain and how appropriate pain management may improve quality of life. |